论文部分内容阅读
学理上“合法权益”有“法定说”、“法不禁止说”、“司法保护说”等学说,“法定说”又因对“法”的认知不同而分出四种观点。最高人民法院公布的部分典型案件超越了制定法和学理解释,从“扩张‘法’的外延”和“摆脱明文规定的字面束缚”两个维度对形式“合法权益”进行了突破。结合规范、学理和司法实践,认为在过去20多年发展中,“合法权益”渐向“正当权益”趋同。建议将来修订《行政诉讼法》时,认真对待合法权益。
In theory, “lawful rights and interests” have “legal say ”, “law does not prohibit say ”, “judicial protection theory ” and other theories, “legal say ” because of “law ” Cognitive differences and points out four points of view. Part of the typical cases promulgated by the Supreme People’s Court goes beyond statutory and academic interpretations, from the “extension” of the law of “extension” and “get rid of the literal bound expressly stated” “two dimensions of the form of” legitimate rights and interests “ A breakthrough. In combination with norms, theories and judicial practice, we think that in the past 20-plus years of development, ”legitimate rights and interests“ have gradually converged toward ”legitimate rights and interests“. Proposed amendments to the ”Administrative Procedure Law" in the future, take the legitimate rights and interests seriously.