“坦白从宽,抗拒从严”是我国长期适用的一项刑事政策,时过境迁,在建设法治国家的法治大背景下,产生了针对此项政策的不同态度:彻底废除、延伸引用等等。本文通过将此项政策与坦白制度、辩诉交易制度进行比较和分析,认为不论是从法理还是司法实践的角度,“坦白从宽,抗拒从严”制度都不具备写入法律文本的资质。 In the context of establishing the rule of law in a state under the rule of law, different attitudes toward this policy have emerged: total elimination, extension of quotations, etc. . By comparing and analyzing this policy with the system of frankness and plea bargaining, we believe that neither the “lenient, lenient, strict” system has the qualifications to write legal texts, either from the point of legal or judicial practice .