从年初至今互联网上的“馒头”事件引发出的一连串“博弈”效应,在法学领域具有值得深入发掘的理论价值。本文采用一种“抽丝剥茧”的论证方式,对“馒头”案所涉的私法问题、宪法问题以及宪法与私法之间的博弈问题进行深入细致的阐述,对博弈各方的宪法权利、权利冲撞、冲撞协调给予了一一论证。并结合德国经验的启示,提供了符合中国国情的宪法权利冲突解决方案,为宪法权利进入私法提供一种“实证”性的进路。 From the beginning of the year to the present, a series of “game” effects triggered by the “steamed bread” incident on the Internet have theoretical value worthy of further exploration in the field of law. In this paper, we use a “cliche” theory to elaborate on the private law issues, the constitutional issues and the game between the constitutional law and the private law in the case of the “bread” case, and expound the constitutional rights of all parties involved in the game , The right collision, collisions and coordination gave one by one argument. Combined with the enlightenment of German experience, provides a solution to the conflict of constitutional rights in line with China’s national conditions and provides an “empirical” approach to constitutional rights into private law.