论文部分内容阅读
法庭言论入刑固然有其必要性,但也不是毫无逻辑和底线。“明显而即刻危险原则”“真实性抗辩原则”“公共利益原则”等,英美国家精心设计的致力最大限度保障言论自由的方案,为厘清法庭言论的刑法边界提供了有益借鉴。划分刑民边界,明晰要件要素,扩展阻却事由,保护善意言论;高配入罪门槛,区分善意和恶意、公益和私利,等等,在审慎扩权的同时严格限权,是新条款施行平行不悖的两条进路。
While it is certainly necessary for the court to make a speech into the penalty, it is not without logic and bottom line. The principle of obvious and immediate danger, the principle of defenses of truth, the principle of public interest, etc. The programs devoted to protecting freedom of speech in Britain and the United States have provided a good example of clarifying the boundaries of criminal law in court Learn from Dividing the boundaries of the people and the people, clarifying the essentials of the elements, expanding the causes of resistance, and protecting the goodwill; Setting the threshold of high crime, distinguishing between goodwill and evil, public welfare and self-interest, and so on. Paradox of the two ways.