论文部分内容阅读
相对不起诉涵盖范围的有限性和适用条件的概括性、模糊性加之适用程序的繁琐制约了检察机关不起诉裁量权的合理行使。司法实践中不能将“犯罪情节轻微,不需要判处刑罚或免除处罚”的规定割裂开来判断是否符合相对不起诉的条件。对于重罪案件,只要存在情节轻微的情形,可以作出不起诉决定。对受害人权利保护的关注与加强,使刑事和解取得了与相对不起诉制度对接的基础。刑事和解与不起诉之间有很好的互补关系,二者具有前因与后果、条件与结论的内在联系。构建和完善不起诉制度是转型时期科学发展观在公诉制度中的运用,更是国家对检察权在新的历史时期的科学考量,是建设和谐社会所必需的。
The generalization and ambiguity of the limited and applicable conditions of the coverage of non-prosecutions combined with the cumbersome procedures of application have restricted the reasonable exercise of procuratorial authority’s non-prosecution discretion. Judicial practice can not be “minor criminal circumstances, do not need to sentence or exempt from punishment, ” the provisions of split to determine whether the relative non-prosecution conditions. For felony cases, non-prosecution decisions can be made as long as there are minor circumstances. The concern and strengthening of the protection of victims’ rights have made criminal reconciliation the basis for docking with the non-prosecution system. There is a good complementary relationship between criminal reconciliation and non-prosecution. Both of them have the internal relations of antecedents and consequences, conditions and conclusions. The construction and improvement of the non-prosecution system is the application of the Scientific Outlook on Development in the prosecutorial system during the transitional period. It is also the scientific consideration of the procuratorial power in the new historical period by the state and is necessary for building a harmonious society.