论文部分内容阅读
齐齐哈尔建城时间向存两说,一说建于清康熙三十一年(1692年),一说建于康熙三十年(1691年)。在官方文献中,《大清一统志》主前说,《盛京通志·城池》主后说。在私人著述中,西清著《黑龙江外纪》主前说,英和著《卜魁纪略》主后说。这些有代表性的文献和著述曾为研究者辗转引用,并有一定影响。两说虽然仅一年之差,但对考订历史,则不容轻视。有人认为论证齐齐哈尔建城的文献资料已很充分,本无可争议,如果再有档案史料作为佐
Qiqihar built to save the city time to save two that one built in the Qing Emperor Kangxi thirty-one years (1692), one said thirty years of Kangxi (1691). In the official literature, the chief of the “Qing Yi Tong Zhi” said before the Lord Shengjing Tongzhi City. In his private writings, West Qing Dynasty said before the main book “Heilongjiang Outer Century” that Britain and the “Lord Michael Küche” said. These representative documents and writings were quoted for researchers and have some influence. Although the difference between the two is only one year, the examination history should not be ignored. Some people think that it is indisputable that the documents and materials on the establishment of the city of Qiqihar have been sufficiently substantiated.