论文部分内容阅读
票据质押作为信用担保方式受担保法和票据法双重规范 ,担保法规范标据质押的原因关系 ,即质押合同 ,而我国票据法及有关司法解释则票标据质押作为票据行为加以规范。但标据质押行为与一般票据行为有重大区别 ,其性质上应属于民事法律行为中的债权质押行为。因此对于票据质押行为不宜适用有关票据行为的规范。以记载“禁止背书”字样的票据进行质押时 ,质权人不能享有票据权利但能够享有民事权利。对我国有关票据质押方面的规范应结合上述原理加以修正。
As a method of credit guarantee, bills pledging are regulated by both the guarantee law and the negotiable instrument law. The guarantee law and standard are based on the pledge reason, namely the pledge contract, while our negotiable instruments law and relevant judicial interpretations are the pledges and pledges as the negotiable instruments. However, there is a significant difference between the act of taking pledge and the act of ordinary bills, which should be pledged in the nature of civil law. Therefore, it is not appropriate for the pledge of notes to be applicable to the behavior of negotiable instruments. In order to record the “prohibition of endorsement” the words of the pledge, the pledgee can not enjoy the rights of the instrument but can enjoy civil rights. The regulations on the pledge of negotiable instruments in our country should be amended according to the above principle.