“古史辨运动”的兴起这一学术史事件为观察学术媒介与近代史学的深层次关联提供了一个有代表性的案例。从学术媒介的角度来看,《与钱玄同先生论古史书》发表后引发的轰动效应,与《努力周报》良好的学术传播效果有关;在随后展开的古史讨论的过程中,《读书杂志》等报刊媒介又为“疑古派”取得讨论的胜利提供了诸多舆论上的便利;而当《古史辨》第一册刊发之时,朴社等出版媒介则为顾颉刚全力推销该书提供了很大的助益。总之,学术媒介在“古史辨运动”兴起历程中扮演了不可或缺的角色,而“古史辨运动”的兴起,不仅推动了中国史学的近代化进程,还扭转了近代史学的方向。 The rise of the “ancient history of discrimination movement” This academic history events for the observation of academic media and modern history of the deep-level correlation provides a representative case. From the academic media point of view, the sensationalism effect after the publication of the “Ancient History Books with Qian Xiantong” was related to the good academic communication effect of “Endeavor Weekly.” In the ensuing discussions on the history of ancient history, “Reading Magazine ”and other newspapers and magazines and media for the“ suspect ”to obtain the victory of the discussions to provide a lot of public opinion on the convenience; and when the“ ancient history of discrimination, ”the first volume was published, Pu and other publishing media for Gu Jie gang full The sale of the book offers a great deal of help. In short, the academic media played an indispensable role in the rise of “the movement of ancient history.” The rise of “the movement of ancient history distinguished movement” not only promoted the process of modernization of Chinese historiography, but also reversed the modern era History of the direction.