论文部分内容阅读
在上世纪50年代末、60年代初“对历史的叙述”的创作中,被主流叙事规范认可和被一度压抑的文本是研究者关注的重点所在。“曹操系列”在与主流意识形态话语和叙事规范对应中多有疏离,是一种独特的存在。在史诗性、个体化历史叙事之外,它提供了另一种哲学境界的历史叙事。“曹操系列”像一面微型的镜子折射出50年代末、60年代初“对历史的叙述”的写作以及新时期重估“十七年”文学作品的价值评判体系两方面存在“矫枉必须过正”的偏颇。这正是让师陀感到焦虑不安的。
In the late 1950s and early 1960s, in the creation of “historical narration,” the texts that were recognized and suppressed by the mainstream narrative norms were the focus of researchers’ attention. “Cao Cao series ” in alienation from the mainstream ideological discourse and narrative norms, is a unique existence. In addition to epic, individual historical narratives, it provides another historical narrative of the philosophical realm. “Cao Cao series ” like a miniature mirror reflects the late 1950s, early 60s “the history of the narrative ” writing and revaluation of the new era “seventeen ” literary works of value judging system There is a bias of “overcorrecting”. This is exactly what made Shitou feel anxious and anxious.