论文部分内容阅读
雷蒙·阿隆的历史哲学批判是一种历史本体论和认识论双层面的构建,他试图通过一种历史学的方法论的重构——说明和理解之间的循环,借由一种或然决定论来重新确立历史客观性的界限;同时,为避免落入相对主义的窠臼,其批判最终保留了康德意义上的“真理”的概念作为调节历史客观性建立的基础。他的历史哲学批判,一方面旨在限定历史知识有效性的边界,可被视为一种试图调和思辨的历史哲学和分析的批判的历史哲学的初步尝试;另一方面,亦可作为其政治理论——一种“合理性的”政治观的引论,因此具有一定的学术意义和实践指导意义。
Raymond Aaron’s historical philosophical criticism is a double-layer construction of historical ontology and epistemology. He tries to reconstruct through a methodology of history - the cycle between explanation and understanding, At the same time, in order to avoid falling into the trap of relativism, the critique finally retains the concept of “truth” in Kant’s sense as the basis for regulating the establishment of historical objectivity. His critique of historical philosophy, on the one hand, aims to limit the validity of historical knowledge and can be regarded as a preliminary attempt to reconcile the historical philosophy of speculation and the critical historical philosophy of analysis. On the other hand, his political Theory - a “rational” political view of the introduction, it has a certain academic significance and practical significance.