苏醒期专项护理对手术麻醉效果及术后情况的影响

来源 :中国现代药物应用 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:wuzhenlikk
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
目的研究分析苏醒期专项护理对手术麻醉效果及术后情况的影响。方法 150例接受全身麻醉术的患者作为研究对象,随机分为观察组和对照组,各75例。观察组在苏醒期采用专项护理模式,对照组采用常规护理模式。比较两者患者的躁动情况和相关并发症的发生率及患者对护理工作的满意度。结果术后苏醒期间,观察组患者躁动情况发生率为12.00%,明显低于对照组的32.00%(P<0.05)。观察组患者不良并发症发生率为5.33%,显著低于对照组的13.33%(P<0.05)。观察组患者对治疗的满意度为96.00%,显著高于对照组的77.33%,两组比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对于接受全身麻醉手术的患者,在苏醒期采用专项护理模式可以降低患者术后躁动的发生率以及不良并发症的发生率,提高患者的满意度,促进患者的快速康复。 Objective To study the effects of special nursing during anesthesia on surgical anesthesia and postoperative condition. Methods A total of 150 patients undergoing general anesthesia were randomly divided into observation group and control group, with 75 cases in each group. Observation group in the recovery period using a special care model, the control group using the conventional care model. Patients were compared for agitation and related complications and the patient’s satisfaction with the nursing work. Results During the recovery period, the incidence of agitation in observation group was 12.00%, which was significantly lower than that in control group (32.00%, P <0.05). The incidence of adverse complications in the observation group was 5.33%, which was significantly lower than that in the control group (13.33%, P <0.05). The patients in the observation group were 96.00% satisfied with the treatment, which was significantly higher than that in the control group (77.33%). The differences between the two groups were statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion For patients receiving general anesthesia surgery, the use of special nursing mode in the recovery phase can reduce the incidence of postoperative agitation and adverse complications, improve patient satisfaction and promote rapid recovery of patients.
其他文献
针对目前高校大学生中普遍存在的某些诚信缺失问题,分析探讨了其存在的社会和教育体制方面的原因,提出了从教育和考评体制上的改进措施。