论文部分内容阅读
随着《担保法》和《担保法解释》的出台保证制度得到国内许多学者的关注和研究,保证期间制度也同样如此。但是我们知道《担保法》第25条和《担保法解释》第31条的规定在保证期间上存在着矛盾。所以本文对《担保法》中的保证期间的定义和性质以及其是否可以中断等问题再次进行探讨,并找出解决冲突的对策以便更好地适用保证制度,促进交易的安全和便捷。
With the promulgation of “Guarantee Law” and “Guarantee Law Interpretation” promulgation system has been the concern and research of many domestic scholars, the system of guarantee period is also the same. However, we know that the provisions of Article 25 of the Guarantee Law and Article 31 of the Explanatory Guaranty Law have contradictions in the period of guarantee. Therefore, this article discusses once again the definition and nature of the guarantee period in the Guarantee Law and whether it can be interrupted or not, and finds out the solution to the conflict in order to better apply the guarantee system and promote the safety and convenience of the transaction.