实践证明,以仲裁方式解决日益增多的国际体育纠纷是现阶段最为理想的解决手段。而作为解决国际体育纠纷的主要机构,国际体育仲裁院在仲裁过程中所推崇的强制性仲裁条款却一直饱受争议。本文拟从学理和实证的角度对于强制性仲裁条款的合理性进行分析。 Practice has proved that using arbitration to solve a growing number of international sports disputes is the most ideal solution at this stage. However, the mandatory arbitration clause advocated by the International Court of Arbitration in the process of arbitration has been the subject of controversy as the main agency for the settlement of international sports disputes. This article intends to analyze the rationality of the mandatory arbitration clause from the angle of academic and empirical evidence.