论文部分内容阅读
我国《物权法》第231条规定“债权人留置的动产,应当与债权属于同一法律关系,但企业之间留置的除外”。将发生在企业间的留置权作但书规定,首次确立了我国的商事留置权制度。商事留置权在我国存在明显的规则缺失,造成理论研究和实践操作层面的困难。通过采用商事留置权与民事留置权的比较研究,旨在开辟一条研究商事留置权制度的新途径。在肯定商事留置权独立制度价值的基础上,回答以下两方面问题:第一,商事留置权区别于民事留置权的核心特性;第二,具体制度层面上商事留置权制度成立要件规则之改进。
Article 231 of China’s “Property Law” stipulates that “the movable property lodged by the creditor shall belong to the same legal relationship with the claim, except for the lien retained by the enterprise.” It will happen in the inter-enterprise liens but the book provides for the first time established our commercial lien system. Commercial liens in our country there is a clear lack of rules, resulting in theoretical research and practical aspects of operational difficulties. By adopting a comparative study of commercial liens and civil liens, aiming at opening up a new way of studying the commercial liens system. On the basis of affirming the value of the independent system of commercial liens, we can answer the following two questions: first, the core features of the commercial liens differing from the civil liens; second, the rules of the establishment of the commercial liens system are improved at the level of the specific system.