论文部分内容阅读
《刑法》分则所规定的具体危险犯有其本身的犯罪构成,都可以作为基本犯看待,具体危险犯存在既遂未遂形态。将《刑法》第114条与第115条笫1款之间的关系理解为基本犯与结果加重犯的关系更妥当。这样的界定既可以更好地认定第114条的犯罪本身的既遂、未遂与中止,使放火等罪具有更为清晰的层次,并因此而达到正确适用本罪及限定本罪适用范围的目的。同时,又可以在行为人对第114条的犯罪具有故意而过失造成严重后果的情况下,根据结果加重犯的理论适用第115条第1款的规定,从而防止罪刑不均衡情况的发生。
The specific crimes stipulated in the sub-provisions of the Criminal Law may have their own constitution of crimes committed as basic criminals. The specific dangerous criminals exist in the attempted and unsuccessful forms. The relationship between article 114 of the Penal Code and article 115, paragraph 1, should be understood as a more appropriate relationship between the basic offender and the aggravated offender. Such a definition can not only better determine the completion of the crime of Article 114 itself, attempted and suspended, so that arson and other crimes have a clearer level, and thus achieve the correct application of this crime and the purpose of limiting the scope of this crime. In the meantime, under the condition that the perpetrator has intentional and negligent consequences for the crime of Article 114, the provisions of Article 115, paragraph 1, are applied according to the theory of aggravated offenses so as to prevent the occurrence of an imbalance in crime and penalty.