论文部分内容阅读
语文作为一门学科课程自诞生的那一刻起,就伴随着不断的争论,20世纪初的文学界对“语文误尽苍生”的批判异常猛烈,当这种批判消沉之后,我国迎来新的课改,而此后关于语文的争议又从语文界内部产生。2015年年初,一篇题为《语文教学要走正道》的文章认为新课标中关于语文的定性“工具性与人文性的统一,是语文课程的基本特点”值得怀疑(《语文教学通讯》B刊2015年第1期),“语文素养”超过了语文应有的素养范畴,“语文素养成了
Since the beginning of a subject course, language has been constantly arguing. Since the early 20th century, the literary world has been exceptionally critical of the ”error of the Chinese people“, and when such criticism is over, our country welcomes New curriculum reform, but since then the controversy on the language from within the language community. In early 2015, an article entitled ”Chinese Teaching Should Take the Right Path“ argues that it is doubtful that the definition of language in the new Curriculum Criteria, ”the unity of instrumental and humanity, is the basic characteristic of Chinese courses“ (”Chinese teaching Newsletter “B, No. 1, 2015),” Chinese literacy “exceeded the level of literary attainment,” Chinese literacy became