论文部分内容阅读
强制性侦查措施直接涉及公民人身、财产、隐私等多项权利,我国现行立法并未对搜查、查封、扣押等强制性侦查措施做出系统性规定,缺乏完备的监督制约机制。现行有关对强制性侦查措施监督的立法与司法实践尚存在监督内容和标准不明确、监督机制滞后和监督方式被动、监督手段乏力、自侦案件监督缺失等问题。我国应当明确侦查监督的价值取向,着重从上述几个方面出发,构建以检察机关为主导的对强制性侦查措施的监督控制体系。
Mandatory investigation measures directly involve citizens’ personal rights, property, privacy and many other rights. Our current legislation does not provide for systematic investigation of mandatory investigation measures such as search, seizure and seizure, and lacks a complete supervision and restriction mechanism. The existing legislation and judicial practice on the supervision of compulsory investigation measures still contain unclear contents and standards of supervision, lagging supervision mechanisms, passive supervision methods, weak supervision means and lack of self-inspection supervision. Our country should make clear the value orientation of investigation and supervision and lay stress on starting from the above aspects to establish a system of supervision and control over compulsory investigation measures led by procuratorial organs.