论文部分内容阅读
2004年5月1日,新的《中华人民共和国道路交通安全法实施条例》(简称“《道交法》”)正式施行。2005年年初,以《道交法》第七十六条为依据制定的《机动车第三者责任强制保险条例(草案)》(简称“《条例》”)由国务院法制办向社会公布并广泛征求意见,围绕交通事故损害赔偿处理由以往的“以责论处”转变为“无过错责任”原则的提法,社会各界广泛关注,更为保险业界所关注。从媒体的报道来看,《道交法》涉险条例遭公开“挑刺”颇多。“挑刺”理由一:各方利益保护不公平保监会财险监管处处长董波坦言,按照《条例》规定,今后第三者强制险费率走势很不乐观。因为,“无过错责任”原则的提法,使保险
On May 1, 2004, the new “Regulations for the Implementation of Road Traffic Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China” (the “Road Traffic Act”) came into effect. At the beginning of 2005, the “Regulations on the Compulsory Third-party Motor Vehicle Insurance (Draft)” (“the Regulations”) formulated on the basis of Article 76 of the “Road Traffic Act” was announced to the public by the Legal Affairs Office of the State Council and widely solicited opinions , The formulation of the principle of compensation for damages arising from traffic accidents from the previous “taking account of blame and blame” to “no-fault liability” has drawn wide attention from all sectors of society and has drawn more attention from the insurance industry. Judging from media reports, there are quite a few “pricks” in the regulations on the “Road Traffic Law.” “Prick” reason one: the interests of all parties to protect unfair CIRC Director of Insurance Regulatory Affairs Dong Bo admitted that, in accordance with the “Ordinance” provides that in the future a third party compulsory insurance rates are not optimistic. Because, “no fault liability” principle of reference, so that insurance