论文部分内容阅读
现行刑法对聚众斗殴罪只做了简单规定,未作具体描述,也缺乏相关的司法解释,导致学术界和实务界对本罪的概念及犯罪构成认识不一。包括了该罪是不是对偶性犯罪、单方聚众斗殴是否构成本罪等关于该罪等基本概念问题。特别是“聚众”和“斗殴”的内涵,“聚众”的人数和范围,“首要分子”和“其他积极参加者”等主体问题的认定和理解,争议都很大。犯罪主体界定的模糊可能导致犯罪定性以及法律适用的错误,影响司法统一性和公正性。因此,笔者希望通过对聚众斗殴主体认定问题的分析对司法实践提出一些看法建议,以期社会秩序得到更好的维护。
The current Criminal Law only provides simple rules on the crime of aggression and affray. Without a specific description and a lack of relevant judicial interpretation, the academic circles and practitioners have different understandings on the concept of crime and the constitution of crimes. Including the crime is not a dual crime, unilateral gatherings fight whether or not constitute the crime and other basic concept of the crime and other issues. In particular, the connotation of “gathering people” and “fighting”, the number and scope of “gathering people”, the identification and understanding of major issues such as “chief numerator” and “other active participants” and disputes Are great. The ambiguity of the definition of the criminal subject may lead to the qualitative characterization of the crime as well as the error of law application, affecting the unity and impartiality of the judiciary. Therefore, I hope to put forward some opinions and suggestions on judicial practice through the analysis of the affirming issues of affray fighting in the hope that the social order will be better maintained.