论文部分内容阅读
卡西尔认为 ,历史科学与自然科学赖以区分的依据是研究对象的差异。历史学的对象是符号性的存在。历史学家的任务是解读符号。历史学虽然是关于激情的历史 ,但历史学本身不能成为激情。历史学是拟人的 ,努力追求一种“客观的拟人性”。本文试图从历史科学与自然科学的区分、历史的客观性及历史的科学性等问题上 ,对卡西尔的历史哲学进行述评。
Cassirer believes that the basis for the distinction between history and natural sciences is the difference between the research objects. The object of history is the symbolic existence. The task of historians is to interpret the symbols. Although history is a history of passion, history itself can not be a passion. History is anthropomorphic, and strive to pursue an “objective anthropomorphic.” This article tries to comment on the historical philosophy of Cassire from the aspects of the distinction between history science and natural science, the objectivity of history and the historical science.