后现代视阈中历史和诗学的同构性

来源 :外语学刊 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:liongliong532
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
海登·怀特解构了传统历史主义“客观性”和“逼真性”理论内核,认为历史是诗学叙事和主观阐释,是意识形态的集中体现,它表现出隐性的权力关系和政治倾向。琳达·哈钦的“历史书写元小说”理念重新界定了文学和历史等的关系问题,探讨后现代文学文本中的历史呈现和政治介入。前者审视历史的诗性建构,后者探究文学的历史属性,然而两者异曲同工,都力证后现代框架中历史和文学的同构性本质。 Hayden White deconstructs the theoretical core of traditional historicism “objectivity ” and “realism ”. He holds that history is a poetic narrative and a subjective interpretation, which is a concentrated embodiment of ideology and shows a hidden power relationship And political inclination. Linda Hutchin’s “Historical Writing Novel” redefines the relationship between literature and history, and discusses the historical presentation and political intervention in post-modern literary texts. The former examines the poetic construction of history, while the latter explores the historical properties of literature. However, both of them are similarities and differences and prove the isomorphism nature of history and literature in the post-modern framework.
其他文献