论文部分内容阅读
20世纪60年代激进化后的文学表达关联于“物”的难题。这一难题关乎中国社会主义实践的结构性矛盾,同时又中介于当时的政教机制,并由后者提供规范性的解决途径。《艳阳天》中诸种人物对于物的感觉、评价乃至扬弃的策略,迂回地关联着历史实践的难题。物质享受的正当性在叙事中有其位置,然而此刻的物质享受又受到政治-伦理的中介,同时,物质扬弃有着审美的解决途径。而小说对于萧长春卷入交换活动的简化处理,尤其是萧与赶集群众之间的叙述距离,正是那一时期社会形式的诗学表达。从萧长春这一“当家人”形象中亦可读解出“新人”之“心”的特质。小说叙事却不经意地暴露了:由“物”之命题带出的矛盾以及“心”之改造的困难,远比文学自身的解决路径复杂。
The post-radical literary expression in the 1960s was related to the “matter” problem. This problem concerns the structural contradictions in the practice of socialism in China, meanwhile, intervenes in the constitutional and political mechanisms at the time, and the latter provides a normative solution. The feeling, evaluation and even abandonment of various characters in the “sunny day” are roundaboutly linked with the problems of historical practice. The legitimacy of material enjoyment has its place in the narrative. However, material enjoyment at the moment is mediated by politics and ethics. At the same time, material sublation has an aesthetic solution. The novel’s simplistic handling of Xiao Changchun’s involvement in exchange activities, especially the narrative distance between Xiao and the masses in the rush, is exactly the poetical expression of social forms in those days. From Xiao Changchun this “when the family ” image can also be interpreted “newcomer ” “heart ” traits. The narrative of the novel inadvertently exposes the contradictions brought about by the proposition of “matter ” and the difficulty of reforming “heart ”, which is far more complicated than the solution of literature itself.