论文部分内容阅读
公安机关及大部分学界、社会人士对“毒驾”入罪持积极支持态度。但是,综观我国道路交通行政法,治理“毒驾”并非无法可依:未造成重大交通事故的“毒驾”行为,可进行行政处罚,并吊销其驾照。造成严重后果且在事故中负主要责任的,以交通肇事罪或以危险方法危害公共安全罪定罪处罚。关于“毒驾”禁令,浙江等地较早做出,后公安部跟进,全国加强治理,部分地方性法规和规章中也有规定。应当理性分析“毒驾”入罪论,反思其风险刑法立场,入罪有悖刑法的谦抑性,且不符合罪刑法定原则,要审慎看待所谓“民意期待”。“毒驾”入罪与否的争议本质上是法益保护和人权保障权衡的问题。
Public security organs and most of the academic and social circles actively support the conviction of “drug driving”. However, a comprehensive review of China’s road traffic administrative law, governance, “drug driving” is not impossible: no serious traffic accidents caused by “drug driving” behavior, administrative penalties can be imposed, and revoked their driver’s license. Causing serious consequences and having the main responsibility in the accident, shall be punished with the crime of traffic accident or the crime of endangering public safety by dangerous means. On “drug driving ” ban, Zhejiang and other places made earlier, followed by the Ministry of Public Security to follow up the country to strengthen governance, some local laws and regulations are also provided. We should rationally analyze the criminal theory of “criminal driving”, reflect on its position of risk criminal law, and incriminating is contrary to the modesty of criminal law and does not meet the statutory principle of crime and punishment. We should carefully consider the so-called “expectation of public opinion”. “Drug driving ” controversial or not into the sin is essentially the protection of law and human rights protection trade-off issues.