对老年高血压患者实施常规护理、优质护理的有效性及价值对比研究

来源 :中国医药指南 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:snrgw91924
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
目的 探究分析老年高血压患者治疗中常规护理以及优质护理的应用情况?方法 本次研究对象均选自本院2018年6月至2019年6月收治的老年高血压患者,共86例,按照患者的入院时间对其进行分组,分别为研究组43例以及对照组43例,对照组治疗中实施常规护理,研究组治疗中实施优质护理,主要包括评估健康状况?加强健康教育?全面关注心理状态?加强饮食护理?营造舒适的治疗环境及指导适合的运动干预,对比患者护理前后血压水平以及护理后血压控制效果,并统计患者的护理满意度评分以及依从性?结果 护理前,两组患者的血压水平对比无统“,”Objective To explore and analyze the application of routine nursing and high-quality nursing in the treatment of elderly patients with hypertension. Methods The subjects of this study were all selected from 86 elderly patients with hypertension admitted to our hospital from June 2018 to June 2019. According to the time of admission, the patients were divided into study group (43 cases) and control group (43 cases). Routine nursing was carried out in the treatment of the control group, and high-quality nursing was carried out in the treatment of the research group. It mainly includes evaluating health status, strengthening health education, paying attention to psychological state comprehensively, strengthening diet nursing, creating a comfortable treatment environment and guiding suitable exercise intervention, comparing patients\' blood pressure level before and after nursing and blood pressure control effect after nursing, and counting patients\' nursing satisfaction score and compliance. Results Before nursing, the blood pressure levels of the two groups were not statistically significant (P>0.05); after nursing, the diastolic blood pressure of the study group was (73.30±3.10) mm Hg and the systolic blood pressure was (123.40±4.30) mm Hg, respectively. It was (89.90±3.60) mm Hg, and the systolic blood pressure was (139.70±4.10) mm Hg, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The good blood pressure control and nursing compliance in the study group were 93.02% and 95.35%, respectively, and the control group were 76.74% and 72.09%, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).The scores of nursing technique, nursing attitude, nursing duration and health education in the study group were (96.60±2.10), (97.10±1.60), (97.10±1.60), and (97.50±1.60) points, respectively, while the control group was (80.30±2.50) points, (81.20±3.10) points, (82.30±1.60) points, (80.60±1.80) points, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion The implementation of high-quality care for elderly hypertensive patients has an extremely ideal effect. It can provide patients with high-quality care services and encourage patients to actively cooperate with nursing work, thereby effectively improving the effect of blood pressure control on patients, and has high promotion and application value.
其他文献
目的 探讨分析妇产科成分输血预防输血反应的护理对策与研究。方法 本次研究从2019年1月至2021年1月,选择在我院进行成分输血的妇产科患者80例作为本次研究的入组成员,通过随机数表法的方式将其分为两组,分别为对照组(n=40)和观察组(n=40),对照组仅通过常规护理模式进行护理工作,观察组则通过针对性护理模式进行护理工作,对比两组患者的护理满意度、不良反应、生活质量水平以及心理情况。结果 观察组患者的护理满意度、不良反应发生率、生活质量各维度评分、SAS评分、SDS评分均优于对照组(P<0.05)。结
目的 探讨心血管内科急性心绞痛临床治疗护理效果?方法 将我院2019年12月至2020年12月40例心血管内科急性心绞痛患者,按照随机法分为两组?常规组给予常规护理,试验组实施综合护理?比较两组护理前后心脏疾病生活质量量表评分?美国纽约心脏病协会分级?心绞痛视觉模拟评分以及满意度?结果 护理后两组心脏疾病生活质量量表评分显著增高,美国纽约心脏病协会分级?心绞痛视觉模拟评分均显著降低,且试验组心脏疾病生活质量量表评分显著高于常规组,美国纽约心脏病协会分级?心绞痛视觉模拟评分显著低于常规组,P<0.05?试验
目的 分析对老年慢性心力衰竭患者开展饮食护理干预对其康复的作用。方法 分析对象选择于2019年1月至2020年2月在我院就诊的老年慢性心力衰竭患者88例,以护理方案不同为依据实施分组分析,44例开展传统护理方案的患者纳入对照组,44例开展饮食护理干预方案的患者纳入试验组,对两种护理方案的开展效果(血清白蛋白、血清前白蛋白水平、护理满意度、生活质量和治疗依从性)进行对比和分析。结果 对比对照组开展后血清白蛋白(33.80±3.46)g/L、血清前白蛋白(181.68±24.65)g/L,试验组患者开展后血清