论文部分内容阅读
美国《统一商法典》的制定旨在统一各州商法,以消除过去各州判例法之间所存在的矛盾和冲突。但每个州因州情不同而实施的特殊政策导致各州对待法典及其正式评论的态度迥然不同,加之日益变化的商事惯例所带来的压力,目前,以法典为代表的美国统一商法运动再次面临着挑战和考验。若维持商法的统一性并使法典避免重蹈先前统一法之覆辙,各州可能不得不以牺牲某些州权为代价承认州之间的集体利益高于本州利益。
The United States “Uniform Commercial Code” was formulated to unify the commercial laws of the states to eliminate the contradictions and conflicts that existed between the precedent laws of various states in the past. However, the special policies implemented in each state due to the different states of the nation led to the very different attitudes of the states towards the Codex and its official comments. In addition to the pressure brought by the ever-changing commercial practices, at present the Code of United States unified commercial law movement once again Faced with challenges and tests. To maintain the uniformity of commercial law and to make Codex avoid repeating the mistakes of previous unification laws, states may have to admit that the collective interest between states is above the state’s interests at the expense of some state power.