论文部分内容阅读
二十多年来,战略过程领域的流派之争始终是管理学界关注的一个焦点问题。本文试图在现有综述的基础上将国内管理学界对战略过程的理解向纵深推进。本文旨在探讨战略过程研究的纷争缘何而起和战略过程研究将何去何从这两个问题;然后从“基本假设不同”与“分类方法混淆”两个层面入手剖析战略过程研究混乱局面的成因;最后基于最新的研究动态,从理论和实证两个方面对该领域研究未来可能的发展方向进行展望。
For more than two decades, the dispute between genres in the field of strategic process has always been a focus of attention of management circles. This paper attempts to advance the understanding of the strategic process by domestic management scholars on the basis of the existing review. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the two issues of why the dispute in the strategic process studies and how the research on the strategic process will proceed. Then, we analyze the causes of the chaos in the strategic process from two aspects: “different basic assumptions” and “confusing classification methods” Based on the latest research trends, the paper forecasts the possible future directions of research in this area from the theoretical and empirical aspects.