论文部分内容阅读
在警察执法过程中,时常会发生危及他人或者自身生命安全的极端情形,导致警察迫不得已开枪射击犯罪嫌疑人,造成了犯罪嫌疑人重伤乃至死亡的重大后果,这往往会引起社会公众的质疑。其质疑的原因主要是由事件发生后警察开枪行为的调查程序缺乏正当性,进而质疑警察开枪行为的正当性。本文通过对实践中典型案例的分析,阐述了判断警察开枪正当性的调查程序是否具有正当性的理论依据与判断标准;阐述我国关于警察开枪正当性调查程序的法律规定及其不足,并借鉴域外类似的规定,提出了完善我国警察执法开枪调查程序的建议,使之更能够体现出程序的正当性。
In the process of enforcing the police law, extreme cases that threaten the safety of others or their own lives often occur. As a result, the police are compelled to shoot at the suspects, causing serious consequences of serious injuries and deaths of criminal suspects. This often leads to public questions. The main reason for this is the lack of legitimacy in the investigation procedure of the police shooting after the incident, which in turn calls into question the justification of the police shooting. Based on the analysis of typical cases in practice, this article elaborates the theoretical basis and criteria for judging the legitimacy of the investigation procedure of police gun shooting. It also elaborates the legal provisions and the deficiencies in the investigation procedure of police gun firing justification in China By referring to similar provisions outside the region, this paper puts forward some suggestions to improve the investigation procedure of police enforcement in our country so that it can reflect the legitimacy of the procedure.