重庆开县肺结核病患者经济负担调查

来源 :中国农村卫生事业管理 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:ankailvyou
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
目的:初步探讨重庆开县结核病经济损失。方法:在一个月内对门诊120名患者和20名住院患者,通过问卷调查其医疗费支出及本人和陪同者就医时交通住宿费、误工等。然后拫据全年门诊确诊人数和住院人数推算全年因结核病所致直接、间接经济负担及总的经济负担。结果:120名门诊患者确诊前就医人均支出1 100元,确诊后至治疗结束人均就医支出5 025元;20名住院患者住院前就医人均支付4 070元,住院期间人均需支付10 778元。按每年新发病1 200人、住院175人推算,一年直接经济负担约989.4万元。而间接经济负担达1 083.1万元,合计经济损失达2 072.5万元。结论:开县结核病经济负担较重,其中直接经济负担中因不能及时诊治占20%;间接经济负担中,不能外出务工所致损失最多,约占70%。因此加强结核病防治健康教育,及早诊断治疗,对恢复健康、减少经济负担具有重要意义。 Objective: To explore the economic loss of tuberculosis in Kai County of Chongqing. Methods: Within a month, 120 outpatients and 20 inpatients were surveyed by medical questionnaires for their medical expenses, transportation accommodation fees and lost time for themselves and their escorts. According to the number of outpatients diagnosed in the year and the number of inpatients, the direct and indirect financial burden caused by tuberculosis and the overall financial burden are estimated. Results: Per capita expenditures of medical treatment in 120 outpatients were 1,100 yuan, and per capita medical expenses from the time of diagnosis up to the end of treatment were 5,025 yuan. 20 inpatients were paid per hospitalized 4,070 yuan and 10,778 yuan per capita during hospitalization. According to the annual incidence of 1 200 new people, hospitalized 175 projections, a year the direct economic burden of about 9894000 yuan. The indirect economic burden amounted to 10.831 million yuan, with a total economic loss of 20.725 million yuan. Conclusion: The economic burden of TB in Kaixian County is heavy, among which the direct economic burden accounts for 20% because of the failure of timely diagnosis and treatment. In the indirect economic burden, the most loss due to not being able to go out to work is about 70%. Therefore, to strengthen health education on prevention and treatment of tuberculosis and to diagnose and treat it as soon as possible is of great significance to restoring health and reducing economic burden.
其他文献
怎样灵活应用乘法公式解题?
阅读案例,感动并思考着:案例中的学生,民主意识、表达意识强烈,渴望被尊重、公平对话。两位班主任,同用议事,但是效果却大相径庭。究其根源在于“干预”过程。如何有效干预,用议事化解问题?  案例一中的梅老师,忽略了民主的主体在于学生,从网络中直接“海选”的竞聘方案,为推优工作埋下了危机的引子。诚如案例中学生所言,“学生投票占70%,班主任投票占30%”违反了民主集中制。  我也曾遇到类似问题:当时我把