论文部分内容阅读
在法律解释的问题上,立场选择与方法运用是“道”和“器”、“体”和“用”的关系,解释立场决定着刑法解释的方向和角度,而解释方法则只是刑法解释的技术和工具。站在不同的解释立场上运用相同的解释方法可能得出不同的结论,相反,站在同样的立场上运用不同的方法也可能得出相同的结论。在刑法解释立场上,存在着主观解释论与客观解释论、形式解释论与实质解释论之争,这些争论不仅仅是方法论上的论争,更是刑法价值观上的论争。立场之争对刑法的解释、适用以及司法审判有着巨大的影响。文章从刑法解释基本立场的抉择问题出发,进而对刑法解释的限度问题做了探讨,并以刑法修正案相关罪名的解释问题为样本,阐述了刑法解释方法的具体运用。
On the issue of legal interpretation, the choice of position and the method of application are the relationship between “Dao ” and “Appliance ”, “Body ” and "Use The method of interpretation is only the technology and tools of interpretation of criminal law. Using the same interpretation method from different interpretive positions may lead to different conclusions. On the contrary, using the same method to arrive at the same position may lead to the same conclusion. In the position of interpretation of criminal law, there exists a debate between subjective interpretation theory and objective interpretation theory, formal interpretation theory and substantive interpretation theory. These debates are not just methodological arguments but also controversial values in criminal law. The position dispute has a huge impact on the interpretation and application of criminal law as well as on judicial adjudication. The article starts from the choice of interpreting the basic standpoint of criminal law, and then discusses the limit of the interpretation of criminal law. At the same time, this article expounds the specific application of the interpretation of criminal law.