论文部分内容阅读
在荀子暴君论研究中存在着两种不同的观点,一种观点认为荀子反对暴君,赞同孟子的汤武革命论;另外一种观点则认为荀子主张服事暴君,反对孟子的汤武革命论。这两种观点都持之有故,言之有理,但也都有其不足之处。前者忽视了荀子对推翻暴君的革命者资格做了十分严格的限制,没有论及荀子服事暴君的言论;后者则没有正视荀子赞同汤武革命的言论,也没有全面揭示荀子提出服事暴君的原因。实际上,荀子对待暴君的态度是复杂而又矛盾的。
There are two different viewpoints in the study of Xunzi’s tyrant theory. One view is that Xunzi opposes the tyrant and agrees with Mencius’s Tang Wu revolutionism. The other view holds that Xunzi advocates serving the tyrant and opposes Mencius’s Tang Wu revolution theory. Both of these views hold the argument, it makes sense, but also has its own shortcomings. The former neglected Xunzi’s very strict restrictions on the qualifications of revolutionary tyrants to overthrow the tyrant. He did not address Xunzi’s remarks about serving the tyrant. The latter did not address Xunzi’s remarks of approving the Tangwu Revolution and did not fully reveal that Xunzi proposed to serve the tyrant s reason. In fact, Xunzi’s attitude towards tyrants is complex and contradictory.