论文部分内容阅读
从世界范围来看,绝大多数国家的最高法院均有形式各异、范围有别的司法规则创制权。大陆法系国家一般是通过法律解释来填补法律的漏洞,从而完成法律之续造,其实质是创制实体性规则;而英美法系国家的普通法本身就是法官的创造物。无论是大陆法系国家还是英美法系国家,基于司法的独立性与自主性之要求,根据宪法或法律之授权,其最高法院均享有程序性司法规则的创制权。我国在充分尊重立法权,并与司法解释权相区别的前提下,有必要赋予最高人民法院司法规则创制权。创制司法规则需要遵循相应的原则与程序。
Judging from the perspective of the world, the supreme courts in most countries have different forms and scope of creation of judicial rules. In civil law countries, the legal loopholes are usually filled by legal explanations, so as to complete the legal creation, the essence is to create substantive rules. Common law in common law countries is itself the creation of judges. Both civil law countries and Anglo-American law countries, based on the independence and autonomy of the judiciary, have the right to establish procedural judicial rules under the constitutional or legal authorization. Under the precondition that our country fully respect the legislative power and distinguish it from the right of judicial interpretation, it is necessary to give the Supreme People’s Court the power to establish judicial rules. The establishment of judicial rules need to follow the corresponding principles and procedures.