《水浒传》疑案试析

来源 :济宁师专学报 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:wqvb1221
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
关于《水浒传》的文学性质疑案,本文认为《水浒传》属于民间文学,是说书艺人的口头创作。史有一个由艺人创作到文人整理、加工、补充的过程,这个过程在书名上有反映。《水浒传》是最后定稿时由文人起的书名。关于《水浒传》的作者疑案,本文认为,《水浒传》曾署名“施耐庵的本”。此话应解释为“施耐庵说话的原本”。既然必是施耐庵说话的本子,那作者就不一定是施耐庵本人。它有可能是书商为了招揽雇客而这样署名的 On the mystery of the literary nature of Outlaws of the Marsh, this article holds that Water Margin belongs to folk literature and is an oral creation of storytelling artists. There is a history of artists from writing to the finishing, processing, replenishment process, this process is reflected in the title. “Outlaws of the Marsh” is the title of a literary man who was finalized. On the “Water Margin” author suspicions, this paper holds that “Water Margin” has signed “this Shinai this.” This should be interpreted as “Shi Naian said the original.” Since it is bound to Shi Naian speak of the book, then the author is not necessarily Shi Naimi himself. It may be that a bookseller is so named in order to attract a client
其他文献
由河北省社会科学院、河北师范大学联合主办,中国唐史学会、武汉大学三至九世纪研究所协办的“唐长孺、胡如雷与隋唐史研究”研讨会于2005年4月16日至18日在河北社科院召开。