学界对于袁世凯的研究,随着上世纪80年代以来所谓“翻案式”的观点反正之沦落,颇形萧瑟。因此,重建史实至为关键。以津镇铁路为例,作为督办大臣的袁世凯,一方面努力协调与同为督办大臣的张之洞的认知、立场,同时,在国人争取路权情绪高涨情形下,在各方请愿要求废约自办的强烈呼声中,坚持主张借款筑路,在谈判中逐渐形成了借债筑路分为两事的思想,并最终与英、德两国达成借款合约,且使之成为了清末民初铁路借款合同的摹本,影响深远。袁世凯的借债筑路、铁路国有思想,渐次形成。 The academic research on Yuan Shikai, with the so-called “refutation” since the 1980s, has diminished anyway. Therefore, the reconstruction of history is the key. Taking Tianjin Railway as an example, Yuan Shikai, as minister of supervision, tried hard to coordinate the cognition and position with Zhang Zhidong, the same minister, and at the same time asked people to demand a reduction of petitions During the intense call from the government, insisting on advocating loans and building roads, the idea of ​​dividing debts into roads and roads was gradually formed during the negotiations and finally reached a loan agreement with Britain and Germany and made it the end of the Qing Dynasty and the beginning of the Republic of China The copy of the railway loan contract has far-reaching implications. Yuan Shikai’s debt to build roads, railway state-owned thinking, gradually formed.