论文部分内容阅读
商业银行告知义务纠纷案例客户顾某持一张某商业银行借记卡,到另一家商业银行下属的自助银行刷卡取款,见自助银行门禁上设有一个装置,和一条提示:进门前请先刷卡并输入密码。顾某刷卡并输入密码后因自助银行门未开而离去。此后顾某发现借记卡内存款少了万余元,顾某报案并向法院起诉发卡银行,要求发卡银行赔偿被盗取存款及相应利息。警方查明,顾某所刷门禁上装置为犯罪分子安装的盗码设备。审理法院认为,自助银行的门禁处缺少使用说明、操
Commercial banks to inform the obligation dispute cases Customer Gu Mou hold a commercial bank debit card to another commercial bank affiliated self-service bank credit card withdrawals, see the self-service bank access control has a device, and a Tip: Please swipe before entering And enter the password. Gu a credit card and enter the password because the self-service bank door is not open and leave. After Gu found that debit card less than 10,000 yuan deposit, Gu reported to the court and sued the issuing bank, requiring the issuing bank compensation for stolen deposits and the corresponding interest. Police found that Gu access by brushing devices installed for the criminals installed Pirates of the code equipment. The trial court held that the self-service bank’s access control office lacks instructions