同步录音录像通常可以归为犯罪嫌疑人供述和辩解,特殊情形下可以归为证人证言、视听资料。录音录像记载内容与讯问笔录不一致,原则上应肯定录音录像的证明力,但不应绝对化,需具体情况具体分析。对讯问全过程应实施不间断的同步录音录像,其中“讯问全程”不应作扩大解释。庭审中播放录音录像,审判公开会容易泄露侦查秘密,应尽力避免。保障犯罪嫌疑人在讯问时对录音录像的选择权,对录音录像保管监督权,以及合理的使用权。 Simultaneous audio and video recordings can usually be classified as criminal suspects confession and excuse, in exceptional circumstances can be classified as witness testimony, audio-visual materials. Inconsistencies between recorded contents of transcripts and transcripts of transcripts of transcripts should in principle be affirmed by the authenticity of transcripts and videos, but they should not be absolute and need to be analyzed concretely. The whole process of interrogation should be carried out uninterrupted video recording, in which “the whole process” should not be expanded explanation. Play audio and video recording in court, public trial will easily reveal the secret of investigation, should try to avoid. Protect the suspect’s right to choose the audio and video recording during interrogation, custody of the audio and video custody, and reasonable use of the right.