本文分《春秋》总论、三传(《左传》《公羊》《穀梁》)、《春秋》学史、专题研究、《春秋纬》、出土文献、文献整理等几个方面概括介绍了2011年《春秋》学研究的大致状况。2011年《春秋》学研究成果丰富,据不完全统计,各种论著达360余种,在多方面都有一定的进展,也出现了一些亮点,比如有研究国外《春秋》学史的专著出版,对明代《春秋》学研究的增多。但也存在几点不足:第一,《春秋》学史研究冷热不均,仍集中在汉、宋、清三个发展高峰,其余朝代的研究较少;第二,文献整理以《左传》为主,且整理以普及通俗读物为主,缺乏深入的研究,相对数量众多、种类丰富的《春秋》学文献而言很不充分;第三,有的研究缺少创新性,常常是低水平的重复。 This article is divided into several chapters such as general introduction to Spring and Autumn Period, biography of Three Rings (Zuo Zhuan, Rams, Gu Liang), history of Spring and Autumn Annals, special study, Spring and Autumn Wei, unearthed literature and literature review In 2011, “Chun Qiu” study of the general situation. According to incomplete statistics, there are more than 360 kinds of monographs and some progress has been made in many aspects. Some bright spots have also emerged. For example, monographs on the history of foreign studies in Spring and Autumn Period have been published , On the “Spring and Autumn” study of Ming Dynasty increased. However, there are still some shortcomings: First, the history of the Spring and Autumn Annals is uneven in research, still concentrated in the three development peaks of Han, Song and Qing dynasties, and less in the other dynasties. Second, It is not enough in the literature of “Spring and Autumn” which is mainly based on the popularization of popular books, lack of in-depth research, relatively large number and abundant variety. Thirdly, some studies lack of innovation, often low level Repeat.