论文部分内容阅读
本文拟用比较法考察国内外破环野生动物资源犯罪的法定刑的差异,同时比较分析国内破环野生动物资源犯罪与贪污罪等其他法定刑的不同。拟从社会危害性角度、犯罪刑法体系平衡角度阐述掏鸟案罪刑责失衡的原因。综合考虑破坏野生动物资源犯罪的社会危害性等因素,让罪刑责相适应。同时结合破坏野生动物资源犯罪监管执法和司法面临的困境,提出切实可行的解决方案。
This article intends to investigate the difference of statutory punishment of the broken wildlife resources at home and abroad by comparative method and at the same time analyzes the difference of other statutory punishment such as resource crime and corruption crime of domestic broken wildlife. It is proposed that the reasons for the imbalance of criminal liability between digging bird crime and crime should be expounded from the perspective of social harm and the criminal law system. Comprehensive consideration of the destruction of wildlife resources, social hazards and other factors, so that crime and criminal responsibility to adapt. At the same time, combining with the problems of the supervision and law enforcement of wildlife resources destruction and the judicial administration, we put forward feasible solutions.