论文部分内容阅读
由于缺乏一个权威的、明确的规定,涉外定牌加工的侵权认定,司法实践中相左判例纷呈,同样的行为被处以不同的结果,而不同的结果却又来自相同的法律。目前理论界和实务界不认为定牌加工构成商标侵权的主要理由有:定牌加工中的商标标注行为不属于商标“使用”;不存在公众混淆;没有损害事实等等。然而,在我国现行商标法律框架下,这些理由的成立都难免牵强。在无法律规定的合理使用的情况下,定牌加工行为应当被认定构成商标侵权行为。
Due to the lack of an authoritative and definite stipulation, the infringement of affidavit in foreign-related brand-name processing and the judgments in judicial practice are mixed with different precedents and the same acts are given different results while the different results come from the same law. At present, theorists and practitioners do not think that the main reasons why brand processing constitutes trademark infringement include: trademark labeling in brand processing does not belong to trademark “use”; there is no public confusion; no harm to facts and so on. However, under the current trademark legal framework in our country, the establishment of these reasons will inevitably be far-fetched. In the absence of law and reasonable use of the circumstances, the brand processing behavior should be found to constitute a trademark infringement.