论文部分内容阅读
历史形成的学术分类思想、王官之学的影响、现实的学术状况及学术的兴替变化,都影响到《汉书.艺文志》的图书分类。《汉书.艺文志》体现了刘向、班固等学者对当时学术存在的认识,具有相当的理论高度。对于《诸子略》的分类,梁启超、胡适等说纵横、农、杂三家“绝无哲理上根据”是不足为训的。刘、班时代史籍未能独立为类、史书入《春秋》类、史籍入《书》类,都反应了当时史学意识尚未十分明晰;而《小说》类与史书分离,又说明当时史学意识已开始萌芽,认识到了实录是史书的根本特征。阮孝绪《七录序》以为“史书太少,不足以为类”的观点是不全面的。研究将古代目录学著作是否将史部独立为类,划分为《七略》分类系统和四库分类系统。阮孝绪《七录》与王俭《七志》的根本区别,就在于前者体现了史部的独立,属于四库分类系统;而后者仍属于《七略》分类系统。
The academic classification thought formed by history, the influence of Wang Guanzhi ’s study, the actual academic status and the change of academic exchange all influenced the book classification of “Han Shu. Yi Wen Zhi”. “Han. Yi Wen Zhi” reflects the Liu Xiang, Baogu and other scholars on the academic knowledge at that time, with a considerable theoretical height. For the classification of “philosophers”, Liang Qichao, Hu Shih et al. Class history of Liu and Ban did not stand alone as a class. History books were classified into “Spring and Autumn Period” and historical books into “Book” categories, which reflected that the historical consciousness was not yet clear at that time. The separation of “novel” from history books indicates that the historical consciousness Beginning to sprout, recognize the record is the basic feature of history books. Nguyen Hsiao-hsueh’s “Seventh Preface” thinks that “the history books are too few, not enough for the class” is not comprehensive. The study will be the ancient bibliography whether the history of the Department as an independent class, divided into “Seven Liao” classification system and four library classification system. The basic difference between Ruan Xiaoxu’s Seven Records and Wang Jian’s Seven Aces lies in the fact that the former embodies the independence of the Ministry of History and belongs to the Siku classification system while the latter belongs to the Qiliu classification system.