论文部分内容阅读
秦汉诸子都曾广泛的称引《诗经》,作为儒家对立学派的墨子也称引《诗经》多处。《墨子》引《诗》文字与今传本《毛诗》多有不同,在诗意上与《毛诗》基本相同,而在文字和诗意上与三家诗不同。墨子引《诗》忠实于诗句原意,与文章语境相契合。墨子不非《诗》,把《诗》作为可参证的先王之书看待,而对作为乐的载体的《诗》持批判态度。
Various scholars in the Qin and Han dynasties have widely referred to the “Book of Songs,” and Mozi, a Confucian school of opposites, also refers to many places in the Book of Poetry. “Mozi” cited the “poem” text and today’s “Maoshi poem” is more or less the same, with the poem “Maoshi poem” basically the same, but in the text and poetic with the three poem is different. Mozi cited “poem” faithful to the original meaning of the poem, and article context fit. Mozi is not a “poem”, he regards “poem” as a book of kings which can be approved, and holds a critical attitude toward “poetry” as the carrier of music.