论文部分内容阅读
同样发生在2004年9月6日。先是中央电视台“法制在线”节目,讲述烟台海关破获跨国走私大量野生动物的案例,打出的提示字幕赫然为“暴力”推动野生动物走私……然而,十分钟左右的节目并没有任何犯罪团伙抗法镜头,倒是有具体的关于野生动物的经营与消费之间巨额利润的介绍。再者是《北京青年报》一条题为“文化高峰论坛昨日落幕,如何理解中国文化精髓成争议”的消息;其中讲到“关于中华传统文化改编的作品,如《哪吒传奇》中是否宣扬‘暴利’……”即使未曾看过《哪吒传奇》,
The same happened on September 6, 2004. First CCTV “legal online” program, about the Yantai Customs cracked a large number of cross-border smuggling of wildlife cases, playing subtle hurdles as “violence” to promote wildlife smuggling ... However, about ten minutes of the program and no criminal gang anti-law Lens, it touches on the specific about the huge profits between the operation and consumption of wildlife introduction. Another is the “Beijing Youth Daily,” an article entitled “Cultural Summit ended yesterday, how to understand the essence of Chinese culture into a controversy”; which spoke of “on the Chinese traditional culture adapted works, such as” Which legend? “ ’Profiteering’ ... ... ”Even though I have never seen the“ legend ”