论文部分内容阅读
有被告人供述的案件和没有被告人供述的案件,在进行同一认定时,其证据的质和量应有所区别。有被告人供述案件,它的小同一认定之和达到一定量时,就可推导出大同一认定,即人、事同一认定结论;而没有被告人供述案件,只有当它的小同一认定之和等于大同一认定时,才能作同一认定结论。
Where the defendant confession case and the case without the accused confession, the quality and quantity of the evidence should be different when making the same determination. When a defendant confess a case and its sum of small and identical identifications reaches a certain amount, it can be deduced that the same grand identification, that is, the conclusion of the same affirmation of man and the thing, and that no defendant confession case exists only when its sum of minor identities Equal to the same big identification, can make the same conclusion.