论文部分内容阅读
目的观察比较美林混悬液与安乃近注射液的临床疗效。方法选择有高热症状的急性上呼吸道感染患儿(直肠体温≥39.5℃),101例随机分成2组,分别用美林混悬液和安乃近注射液治疗。结果在第1小时内美林混悬液和安乃近注射液的退热效果及退热速度相同,而美林混悬液在第2小时就能使患儿体温降至接近正常体温,并能维持至8h;安乃近注射液未能将体温退至正常,且从用药的4h后呈回升趋势。美林混悬液对咽痛、头痛的缓解也比安乃近更为显著。结论美林混悬液退热作用强,维持时间长,对咽痛、头痛的缓解疗效较安乃近显著。
Objective To observe and compare the clinical efficacy of Merrill Lynch suspension and metamizole injection. Methods Acute upper respiratory tract infection with fever (rectal temperature ≥39.5 ℃) was selected. One hundred and eleven patients were randomly divided into two groups. The patients were treated with Merrill Lynch suspension and metamizole injection respectively. Results In the first hour, Merrill Lynch suspension and metamizole had the same antipyretic and antipyretic rates, while the Merrill Lynch suspension reduced the body temperature to nearly normal body temperature in the second hour Can be maintained to 8h; metamizole injection failed to return to normal body temperature, and from the medication after 4h showed a rising trend. Merrill Lynch suspension of sore throat, headache relief is more significant than the security of Arnold. Conclusions Merrill Lynch suspension has a strong antipyretic effect and maintains a long time. It has a significant effect on the relief of sore throat and headache compared with the analgin.