论文部分内容阅读
关于马克思哲学转向的探讨,矫正了对马哲的一些误解,也深化了对马哲的认识。在以往对马哲特别是马克思历史观的阐释中,存在着重认识轻价值和将马哲知性化解读的倾向,而转向一说却拓展了马哲的研究论域,彰显了其实践性和当代价值,这无疑值得肯定。然而,某些有关转向的阐释,也存在可议之处,关于超越“认识论”模式的理解,即是一例。有的论者认为,马克思在哲学上超越了“认识论模式”,实现了从传统知识论向现代生存论的转换,因而马克思哲学就是“历史生存论”。在这里,“超越”的已不仅仅是“认识论模式”,而是认识论本身。这种理解,关系到马克思主义哲学的当代建构。因此,对于超越“认识论”模式,有几个问题应予辨析。
The discussion on the turning of Marxist philosophy has corrected some misunderstandings to Ma Zhe and also deepened the understanding of Ma Zhe. In the past interpretation of Marx’s historical view, there is the tendency of understanding the light value and interpreting the Marxist intellectualization. However, turning to one theory extends Ma Zhe’s field of study and demonstrates its practicality and contemporary Value, which is undoubtedly worthy of recognition. However, there are arguments for some interpretations of the shift, which is an example of understanding that goes beyond “epistemological” patterns. Some commentators hold that Marx has surpassed “epistemological model” in philosophy and realized the transformation from traditional epistemology to modern existentialism. Therefore, Marxist philosophy is “historical existentialism.” Here, “transcendence” has more than just “epistemological model” but epistemology itself. This understanding relates to the contemporary construction of Marxist philosophy. Therefore, there are several issues that should be resolved in order to go beyond the epistemological model.