论文部分内容阅读
我国学术期刊的评估工作已进行了30年,最近,政府把学术期刊的评估工作交由协会、学会去履行。以往我国学术期刊的评估实际上无一例外是进行了纵向考察和评估,即仅仅进行期刊本身质量的纵向评估,并且这种纵向考察往往局限于对学术期刊客体的评估,缺乏对学术期刊编辑主体的评估;以往我国学术期刊的评估更没有进行横向的、相对的质量评估。以后的学术期刊评估应当补充主体评估,更要进行数学坐标式的纵横双向的科学评估,即补充进行横向评估。
The assessment of academic journals in our country has been conducted for 30 years. Recently, the government handed over the evaluation of academic journals to the Association and learned to fulfill it. In the past, the evaluation of academic journals in our country was virtually carried out vertical investigation and assessment without any exception, that is, the vertical assessment of the quality of the journal itself was conducted. This vertical investigation was often limited to the evaluation of academic journals, Assessment of academic journals in the past did not conduct horizontal, relative quality assessment. Subsequent evaluation of academic journals should supplement the main assessment, but also conduct a horizontal and two-way scientific assessment of mathematical coordinates, which supplements the horizontal assessment.